The president recess-appoints a fan of rationing and Britain's National Health Service to direct one-third of American health care. Why does the administration want his views hidden from scrutiny?
Too bad there can't be a real debate about rationing of health care.
There are going to be winners and losers with the new health care law.
Losers don't get the care they need. What happens then? What are the choices?
Thanks to my friend Saul for pointing to this article.